Chris (who has way better birding ears than this old guy … well, he is younger) and I led a group of 26 birders on Bird Protection Quebec field trip this morning in the Morgan Arboretum and the adjacent fields. To be honest, we started with 26 but ten got eaten by bears as we ended with 16 … but it was cold, and grey and damp and we walked for four and a half hours. It was a brilliant morning’s birding … and it’s not even warbler season yet. Thanks to everyone who came and joined in the fun.
Total species seen … an amazing 50. That HAS to be a record for April. There will be a follow-up walk in the arboretum on 27 May that will give us plenty of migrating warblers and their friends to add to today’s list.
Hard to know what was the “bird of the day”? The Eastern Bluebirds maybe, or the Pintails, or the two Broad-winged Hawks, or three Pine Warblers interacting, or … well, pick your own.
Here is the species list FOLLOWED BY LOTS OF PHOTOGRAPHS.
Apr 22, 2017 7:50 AM – 12:00 PM
Protocol: Traveling – 5.0 kilometer(s) – 51 species
The pictures that I post there and which a lot of people tell me they enjoy, are ones that (I think) are a bit better than run of the mill snapshots and so I would like to enable people to see them at as high a quality as possible. I use Facebook for this because, and I know it’s an awful cliché, that’s “where everyone is”.
But, and it’s a big but, FB use really savage algorithms to compress and degrade the quality of any posted image they let you put on their site. It probably doesn’t matter if it’s another selfie or kitten but it matters to me. To get around this, I use FB to alert people to the presence of an photograph and also post a link to my photography website where a much better quality version of the image is available for those who care about these things.
Why bother? Well, here’s a great example that clearly demonstrates the damage FB does … the first photograph below is the version FB have made public. The second is a screen copy from my website (http://photography.sparroworks.ca/2017/04/17/iris-reticulata/). Look at the water droplets on the petals … this is exactly the same version of the photograph but in FB’s iteration they are fuzzy edged while on the other site they are bright and sharp.
And here, to emphasise the point, is a selected area to demonstrate exactly the problem … FB on the left and Sparroworks on the right.
Now, I now why they do this, it’s to save file size. My original photo is 761 KB and Facebook’s version is a mere 45KB … that’s a mere 6% of the original web image uploaded to their servers. That is not “compression” but premeditated murder …
I and others would happily pay a little fee to be able to post better quality photographs on FB but they don’t give us that option. I’m not looking for freebies but I do think this is unconscionable behaviour on their part.
So – be warned … those pictures you share are being downgraded too. Not just a bit, but by a LOT.
You may already know this, but just in case you have been living under a rock for some years (like us) you may profit from reading on.
Like many people hereabouts, we have a media bundle from Bell Fibe that gives us TV, internet and landline telephone. We use the internet all day long and the telephone as little as possible. In fact the telephone is pretty much the collecting ground for spam cold-calling guys but it is useful occasionally. As for the TV – we have been paying about $50 a month for the cheapest programme bundle and the “privilege” of watching a 60 minute (minus 15 minutes of adverts) a night news bulletin. That’s about the limit of our TV watching – very rare we look at anything else at all – too many good books in the world to read and fine meals to eat to waste much time on soaps.
So – let’s just cut-the-cable we decided, get the news over the streaming box and save $600 a year.
I called Bell … quite a saga (some tips below if you want to try this) and learned that nothing can be disconnected until you have spoken to a “retention specialist” with an impenetrable third-world accent and at the end of a long wait time on the phone.
Briefly, to keep this short, we worked out that Bell are desperate to keep cable customers even if they never look at TV. Losing cable customers hits their bottom line and more to the point hits their stock price.
End of the day – we keep the TV, we got a free upgrade to unlimited internet useage and just shy of a $60 cut in the bundle price meaning that now we pretty well get the TV part free. Insisting on disconnecting TV would have actually put the monthy fees up as existing discounts would vanish – weird but true. They are that desperate to keep looking good to the stock markets.
So – give Bell a call. What’s to lose.
The joys of the modern world.
When you call them (310-2355 – no area code – is the best number) do not select #3 in the options even if it is the choice for cancelling a service. You will be put on endless hold and never speak to anyone. Select #4 which is for changing your service – you get a pick-up within a couple of minutes because they think you want to add expensive features – take it from there.
While working up to this and assuming cable would disappear from our house, we made sure we had all the gadgets installed for streaming live news broadcasts. It’s the 9pm CBC National that we usually watch and we expected, as it was live, to have to put up with the adverts for cars and that effin’ Livrelief gunk … but no, the slots for adverts were replaced by wonderful archive clips of 50 year old street scenes, 1960’s tech programmes extolling the wonders of the video-phone that “we will soon all have in our houses” and more. The background music was pretty decent jazz too. What’s not to like – stream your news broadcasts whatever else you watch.
Overnight we enjoyed 32cm of snow on the West Island which, according to Environment Canada, is almost three times the previous record for this date at a mere 12cm – and it’s still snowing. No complaints, this is Quebec and we have proper winters here, but it is also half way through March, the snow was melting, snowdrops were poking their heads out and birds were returning … rather too early it seems. A couple of days ago I was looking at photos sent rom England where they are basking in a +18C heatwave and the daffodils are blooming.
For all that, things look gorgeous this morning so I am going to post some photographs – some of which will be about the birds because most of the day so far has involved digging a path across the garden so I could reach the bird feeders and clear the snow, making them accessible to some very grateful birds.
So – welcome to winter:
This is what we woke to:
And this is what the birds woke to:
While outside, all our neighbours were merrily digging their cars out so they could head off to work … oh, the joys of retirement and the pleasure of being able to pay a guy with a tractor and snow blower to do this for us. I don’t need the car out today, but it was in the garage and snow-free … always puzzles me why almost everyone else fills their garage with trash, leave their cars outdoors and then ,when it snowscomplains about shovelling. Funny people.
So – the feeders had to be cleared …
Everyone was grateful 🙂
To finish – a gallery with all the snow you could ever wish for –
Click any thumbnail to open the images at full size
White-throated Sparrows are cheery little birds that we are always willing to give a welcome to as they pass through the Montreal region on their spring and fall migrations. Although they have been recorded here in every one of the twelve months of the year you can see from this abundance chart for Montreal, that they are normally with us only from mid April for a couple of weeks. … eBird wanted proof of the sighting before accepting our report from today, which got us thinking about what might be going on.
Today is the 6 February, a good two months before their expected appearance and yet we saw a group of perhaps 8-10 birds happily scratching around the bottom of some West Island bushes this morning. Not the first sighting this winter, either. What were the birds up to, and why this far north?
Don’t believe us? Here is the proof:
“Birds of North America” (https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/whtspa/distribution#migroute) tells us that (quote) “Spring migration occurs from mid Mar to late May.” and that “In s. Ontario, peak of migration is last week of Apr to mid-May.” Furthermore, migration in this species is triggered by lengthening daylight as spring approaches so, in fact, climate change should not be affecting their migratory behaviour.
So if not very early migrants could it be that these are winter residents? There are (see map below) year-round populations in the southern parts of New York State and Vermont, not too far away, which leads us to wonder if we are seeing yet another species starting to push it’s way further north in the wake of Wild Turkeys. Northern Cardinals and Carolina Wrens amongst several others in recent years? It does not seem unreasonable to infer that these birds might be either year-round residents (unlikely) or else northern migrants who have chosen to stay in the Montreal area rather than pushing further southwards.
We had also seen four of these birds at the same location on 4 January and other birders have seen one or two such birds nearby (Morgan Arboretum) for the past few weeks and half a dozen isolated reports are available this winter within perhaps 15km of where these birds were seen. Comments on the FB page of Ottawa Field Naturalists have indicated that a small number of White-throated Sparrows are also, atypically, being seen in the Ottawa area. Interesting to speculate.
Thoughts of other birders are invited. Are we seeing the start of yet another species pushing northwards?
I’d like to take the opportunity of introducing readers to an artist friend of ours who is doing some really splendid watercolour work from her studio in deepest Nova Scotia. Sandra’s just put up a website that tells you all about her work. What we particularly like is that her art is based on real, live birds that she has seen herself.
Those birders who know us also know that we operate under the banner of the “Sparroworks Wildlife Co.” and have a great liking in particular for the House Sparrow … so much so that we recently commissioned Sandra to produce this piece to hang on the wall of the Sparroworks HQ.
If you are looking for something unusual and unique get in touch with Sandra … she tells me she will also have greetings cards available in the near future.
This is an experimental post to check out a new means of sharing music on my website. This randomly selected sample track is actually streaming from Spotify which, I have to say, is an excellent streaming service.
The point of the experiment is that the audio quality should be MUCH better than most of the alternatives which apply compression to audio files (yes, Facebook, I am looking at you). I don’t expect to be using this often – don’t worry 🙂
Would you please give me some feedback by letting me now how it comes out at your end of the internet? Especially if you don’t subscribe to Spotify !! Thanks.
This morning saw us setting forth for the first time this winter on snowshoes in beautiful -16C sunshine to do our scheduled shift at the MBO filling up the bird feeders. This is quite the highlight of our winter activities with sun, snow, birds and nobody else around. There was still ice from the freezing rain of mid-week on the trees and it was glistening in the light.
Nothing special in the way of birds other than that we were able to add White-throated Sparrows to our 2017 list. For all that it was a very pleasant morning.
Prompted by the arrival in my inbox of the preliminary count data from the 2016 Hudson Christmas Bird Count and it being a bit chilly outside today – to say nothing of windy and with snow falling – I thought to myself, what better to be doing on New Year’s Eve than to crunch some numbers. I think people will find this interesting – at least, the sort of people I know 🙂
So – here are species bird counts from the Hudson CBC for the past 30 years, from 1986 up to 2015. I have omitted this year’s counts as they are still preliminary figures. Each chart below graphs the number of each species reported for each year and is overlaid with a curve showing the polynomial trend line for the period (exponential trend line for the Wild Turkeys as it’s a better fit). From these it is easy to see which way the populations of our winter birds have been moving in the past three decades. The species were more or less chosen at random from amongst those species with high enough counts most years to be reliable/significant. If anyone would like to look at the data themselves you can download counts for the past 76 years from the Audubon website and play to your heart’s content in the spreadsheet of your choice.
I would be interested in your comments on these data – please use the comment box at the bottom of this post. Thanks.
I am perennially interested in House Sparrows, so this was the first out of the box. Not surprisingly, given what is happening elsewhere in the world, there has been a steady decline in numbers since around 1996 which in the past two or three years appears to finally be levelling off.
Reasonably steady populations averaged over the thirty years with notable peaks and troughs on the actual census days. Worryingly low counts last year (and anecdotally in 2016 also).
As expected – there is a clear upward trend in the numbers of Cardinals being seen in early winter.
Numbers increased for the first ten years but then, with some year-to-year variation, have been reasonably consistent up to the presetn day.
Tend to be localised and move around in flocks so there is an element of chance in finding them in any year. Overall numbers were relatively consistent until the latter twn to fifteen years when there seems to have been a small but regular decline. Account must be taken, however, of great fluctuations from year to year.
Low in number but showing a steady increases over time
A highly inconsistent bird only seen in small numbers but showing a trend towards lower numbers
A gradual increase in the numbers counted over the years
Generally present in consistent numbers year by year.
Interestingly, after an original increase in number they l;evelled off and in recent years are showing a definite decline in population.
At first only very infrequently seen their numbers started to rise noticeable some twenty years ago. It is reasonable to ascribe this to climate change resulting in open water being still present at the time of the count day.
Not seen at all in the circle until 2005 these birds have moved in with a vengeance and show steadily increasing numbers year by year
Reliably consistent species
A slight but consistent increase in numbers
American Tree Sparrow
Consistent in small numbers with annual fluctuations but no definite trend up or down in populations over the thirty years.
In many recent years barely seen at all but there is evidence of a steady or increased population. Insufficient data to be certain.
After an initial increase in numbers in the first decade reviewed here, numbers have been generally consistent
Yesterday was the 76th Hudson Christmas Bird Count and J and I were out all day counting birds on our usual route. I’ll get to the day report shortly but first want to ask you to Consider the Horned Lark.
Why? Because we found something interesting and I think it will interest you also and encourage you to look more closely at the next group you happen upon.
After we had completed our assigned CBC route we decided to go off and look for Snowy Owls. That was not a success but we did happen across a small group of some twenty or so Horned Larks out in the flatlands west of St-Clet and I duly pulled up at a decent distance and crept up on them with the camera. Like Snow Buntings, they are pretty skittish birds and depart when you are some distance away, but I got a few record shots, got back in the car and headed off. It was only when I got home and downloaded the pictures that I realized that I had something unusual. The typical Horned Lark that we see here has a yellow face and throat and indeed, most of the birds showed those markings. Mixed in amongst them though was at least one bird whose face/throat were white. Look at these photographs to see what I mean:
I confess to never before having noticed such differences between birds, ostensibly of the same species, and so did some reading. There are a remarkable 21 recognised subspecies of the Horned Lark which really makes life hard – fortunately most of those are out west which reduced the options somewhat. I concluded – and have confirmed – that the yellow faced birds we normally see here in winter are Eremophila alpestris alpestris while the white faced bird is Eremophila alpestris practicola
The following details are from Cornell’s Birds of North America (goo.gl/9VSvFc):
Our regular yellow-faced bird (E. a. alpestris) is the nominate race, breeds from w. Ontario east to Newfoundland and Labrador. Almost completely migratory, it winters from Manitoba and Newfoundland south to Kansas and N. Carolina, mixing with the resident E. a. praticola . It has a sepia brown dorsum, spectrum yellow, throat, and eyebrow stripe, and white belly.
The white-faced bird (E. a. praticola) is the “prairie” race, breeds from Minnesota to Nova Scotia and south to e. Kansas and N. Carolina. In winter, some individuals move as far south as Florida. Smaller and darker than E. a arcticola, but chin pale yellow to white.
There is also a very useful paper published in 1994 by Ron Pittaway (Subspecies of the Horned Lark; Ontario Birds Dec 1994; 12:3; 109-115) which notes that praticola breed sparsely in southern Ontario and that the breeding range of the Prairie subspecies is separated from the breeding ranges of the two northern subspecies by a wide band of boreal forest.
So finding alpestris alongside praticola is not necessarily unusual provided you are viewing the birds somewhat south and west of here. It’s the praticola bird that is historically out of place here in Quebec.
The take-away from this being not to just note Horned Larks (nice birds, lovely to see on a cold day) but to scan the flock carefully for different forms because they are not all the same. Now – what about the other 19 subspecies? Were any of them present yesterday as well?
Thanks for reading this far – I find this sort of thing fascinating. Now, keep going, the photographs are not far away:
So – back to the Hudson CBC as it played out for J and I who were doing our usual “Route 2″ of the circle.
We have been doing this route consistently each year for a dozen, possibly more, years and so have a pretty good idea of where to look the hardest and where the birds hang out in largest numbers. The day and night prior to this year’s count had seen the area enjoy a heavy fall of freezing rain and cars were in ditches all over the place. Nearby town of Rigaud had closed a couple of roads on their mountain because two of their gritting trucks had gone into the ditches it was that slippery!! Fortunately, by the time we set out in the early morning temperatures had climbed a degree or so above zero and things were not too scary. Our route starts in a residential area of west Hudson, takes us along a countryfied road with big houses and horse barns (and big dogs that chase cars) then down to the flat lands around St-Clet where we always enjoy the winter visitors and hope – usually vainly – for Snowy Owls.
By the end of the day we had ticked off 19 species of birds which is good for the territory we were birding in at this time of year, but we noticed a continuation of recent years in that while the species may be reliable the numbers of individual birds is diminishing. Almost always the first birds we tick off are Blue Jays but yesterday we found only 5 altogether and they all in the southern sector of our census area. Again, flocks of Euro-Starlings used to be the norm around the farms but a mere 24 were seen altogether. It was also noticeable that where once there used to be many bird feeders in gardens, these days we are down to just a couple that are in active use. One in particular that for many years has been swarming with birds when we pass was totally devoid of seed. Hard to understand why people put feeders up and then don’t keep them filled, but there you are, there is no accounting for folk.
Snowy Owls were notable by their absence. This was a pity as one had been photographed a week beforehand on our route but was probably passing through. After the heavy freezing rain the ability of SNOWs to break through the ice crust on the snow and get at their rodent prey must have been seriously compromised.
We found a few Wild Turkeys – handsome birds – as well as a colourful flock of American Robins, Cooper’s and Red-tailed Hawks, two Common Ravens and all the usual birds (list follows). A nice flock of Snow Buntings were very active on the flat fields – attracted to, but not that reliant on, some seed bait left by the banding group who are studying this species. After we had completed our rounds we “invaded” the territory covered by the Route 1 team to look for Snowy owls – again with no success but it did allow us to locate the Horned Larks discussed above.
Anyway – enough of that. It was a good day, the roads were better than expected, and the birding, while hard, was rewarding. Here is a list of the species we added to the CBC count for the day/year and a few photographs.
Wild Turkey 7 – Cooper’s Hawk 1 – Red-tailed Hawk 1 – Rock Pigeon (Feral Pigeon) 115 – Mourning Dove 7 – Downy Woodpecker 5 – Hairy Woodpecker 1 – Blue Jay 5 – American Crow 14 – Common Raven 2 – Horned Lark 20 – Black-capped Chickadee 60 – White-breasted Nuthatch 8 – American Robin 8 – European Starling 24 – Lapland Longspur 6 – Snow Bunting 120 – Dark-eyed Junco 21 – American Goldfinch 5 – House Sparrow 2